MATTERS THAT THE JEHOVAH’WITNESSES of the Watch Tower ARE BANNED BY ITS LEADERS OF reflect " You know how many witnesses there, Jehovah "obey the Watch Tower" were not offered jobs by mail and rip of fear of being apostate letter?
You know how many there letters of sincere people asking questions or issues sincere about the Bible, and were simply "rejected", "broken" and "thrown in the trash" because of the morbid fear of being "apostasy"?
We have imagined a Jehovah's Witness unemployed receive a letter from a firm offering them employment and the Jehovah's Witness rip that letter even before reading it?
Is this not have occurred? Since the leadership of Jehovah have urged witnesses to or conditioned that the witnesses Jehovah not to read anything other than the Association of Watch Tower, (clearly against the commandment of 1 Tess. 5: 21) since any apostate could order him apostate with a letter, does not occur in a company order a letter giving employment to a Jehovah's Witness unemployed and the same "rip it" without at least read it? Yes, you can.
And if the Jehovah's Witness to open the letter and give the company is not offering him employment, and is an apostate, and the elders knew that she read this letter, according to the rules of the Watch Tower, the Jehovah's Witness will to be disassociate Not for disassociate , it must participate in a meeting judicative and explain to the elders in detail everything that occurred and she had no intention to read the letter from the apostate.
If they convince did not intend to read the letter, but read without wanting to, the elders say to her: "You have doubts about the Organization of Jehovah"?
If this person would like to claim that a convincing explanation on the alleged apostasy contained in the letter that she read unintentionally, the order of elders not "waste time" with this "desert sheep," and disassociate, to "protect the rest of the herd ". (There are working to the benefit of the doubt biblical Jehovah's Witness to "not lose time")
Is love of elders to act well? Disassociate without answering the question raised by Jehovah's Witness who opened the letter unintentionally?
This is not the way that the elders have acted? So the rule of the Watch Tower is: Do not open any letter "strange", not read anything on the Internet about religion or about explanations of the Bible that does not originate from the Watch Tower. The question of sincere people who study the Bible, in accordance with 1 Tess. 5: 21 is: "Not the Bible says that the Christian must first make sure all things? As he to go make sure all things if he or she is persuaded not to open any strange letter? And the Bible does not say that the elders should be able to solve any doubt sincere arising between the "sheep"?
Given this, the question is: Who is more certain: the Apostle Paul, who was inspired by God to write 1 Tess. 5: 21 .. IN A MANDAMENTO CRISTÃO saying "Take note of all things" .. or .. Watch the Tower of that beforehand says: "Do not read anything" strange "about biblical references or religious ..?
If you're Jehovah's Witness, answer to those questions, if able. Yes, as a Jehovah's Witness regard the Bible, must be open mind, make sure all things, even if the "pope" does not say that. In this case who does the role of pope is the Watch Tower. Or am I wrong? If you're Jehovah's Witness, answer to those questions, if able.
But if simply abide the biblical commandment of 1 Tess. 5: 21, in detriment to the commandment of men, of course, the above incidents do not occur, or any Jehovah's Witness would run the risk of losing their jobs, since the open letter and would be happy to get a job, would be happy if a letter of apostate and that the doubts of reading this letter would be resolved by elders and love ENABLED Bible.
However, this does not have occurred. Or am I wrong? If you're Jehovah's Witness, answer to those questions, if able. Now perceived as the 'Armageddon' "is taking" to come? Why does the Armageddon is taking to come, OK ? It would not be because of these "pearls" above practised within the "true religion" ...? Or am I wrong? Come on, if you are a Jehovah's Witness, answer to those questions, if it is able
